Do teams truly grasp the power of applying Scrum professionally? This is a challenging and somewhat contentious question. In my experience, many teams I’ve encountered operate more like amateurs than professionals. This isn’t necessarily their fault; it’s often a reflection of the expectations set by their organisations. Too frequently, companies don’t demand professionalism; instead, they push for speed and output, which leads us, as software engineers, to adopt shortcuts that prioritise the easy, fast, and cheap over the right way of doing things. This environment fosters unprofessional behaviour and ultimately undermines the potential of Scrum.
Understanding Professional Behaviour
Most teams lack a clear understanding of what professional behaviour looks like. I recall an enlightening experience with an organisation a few years back. We conducted an exercise aimed at defining what requirements should look like for the engineering team. This wasn’t about the engineers themselves; it involved the product management group.
We gathered everyone in a room, broke them into cross-functional groups, and tasked them with dissecting a user interface from their product. They were to outline the requirements they would have liked to have had, with the benefit of hindsight. The results were eye-opening. They crafted detailed requirements, highlighting the myriad questions they had and the information they lacked. The realisation hit them: “Holy moly, that’s a lot of stuff.”
Then came the second part of the exercise. We asked them to take something from their backlog that hadn’t been built yet and apply the same level of detail. Just as they were getting into it, the head of product management halted the workshop. He candidly admitted that his team wasn’t equipped to create or work with such detailed requirements. This moment of realisation was profound; it illustrated the gap between the professionalism we aspired to and the current capabilities of the product management team.
The Role of Scrum in Professionalism
This scenario is not unique; it reflects a broader issue within many organisations. One of Scrum’s core purposes is to foster transparency. A fundamental expectation for any software team is to deliver a usable, working product at the end of each iteration, including the very first one. This product should be production-ready, this is the minimum standard for Scrum. If your team isn’t achieving this, then you’re not truly practising Scrum; you’re missing the level of transparency required for a professional Scrum team.
Many teams come to a stark realisation: “We’re so far away from that.” This can be a tough pill to swallow. As teams strive to meet this standard, they often uncover gaps in their processes. For instance, they might find themselves reliant on a third-party testing team, which complicates their ability to ensure production readiness. I remember a time at Merrill Lynch when we submitted our websites for third-party penetration testing. We had no insight into the tools they used, and the process cost us a hefty sum. The result? Our product was not ready for deployment because we lacked understanding of the testing tools and processes involved.
Embracing a Professional Work Ethic
The true power of applying Scrum professionally lies in cultivating a professional work ethic. This means creating products that deliver real value to our customers, products they can use and appreciate. Many teams only begin to understand this concept as they embark on their Scrum journey. They start to recognise their knowledge gaps and gradually build the capabilities necessary to evolve into professional teams.
In conclusion, the journey to professionalism in Scrum is not an easy one, but it is essential. It requires a commitment to transparency, collaboration, and a willingness to confront the uncomfortable truths about our current practices. If you’re interested in discussing this further or exploring other topics related to Agile, Scrum, or DevOps, I invite you to book a coffee chat with me through Naked Agility. Let’s work together to elevate our understanding and application of Scrum to truly professional levels.
Smart Classifications
Each classification [Concepts, Categories, & Tags] was assigned using AI-powered semantic analysis and scored across relevance, depth, and alignment. Final decisions? Still human. Always traceable. Hover to see how it applies.
What to read next
Scrum Tapas: The Importance of Professionalism
Explores why professionalism and adherence to engineering excellence are essential for effective Scrum teams, highlighting common pitfalls …
Hardest part of becoming a professional Scrum Master?
Explores why embracing true professionalism is the hardest part of becoming a Scrum Master, highlighting the importance of deep …
The Truth About Newbie vs Professional Scrum Masters: Bridging the Experience Gap
Explores the real differences between new and experienced Scrum Masters, challenging common myths and highlighting the importance of …
Beyond the Rituals: Embracing the Core Principles of Scrum for True Agile Success
Explores how focusing on Scrum’s core principles, empiricism, transparency, and value delivery, leads to true agile success, beyond just …
Stop normalizing unprofessional behaviour in the name of agility
Highlights the importance of professionalism in agile teams, warning against excusing unprofessional behaviour as agility and stressing …
Unmasking Agile: How to Spot Genuine Practices Amidst the Myths
Learn how to identify authentic agile practices, spot common myths, and understand cultural barriers that hinder true agility in modern …
Detecting agile theatre with real delivery signals
Why Most Companies Operating Models Fail in Dynamic Markets
A concise comparison of Predictive and Adaptive Operating Models, explaining why traditional structures fail in dynamic markets and how …
Don’t Manage Dependencies, Remove Them
Explains why dependencies are a sign of poor system design and outlines steps to eliminate them by aligning teams, clarifying ownership, and …
The Estimation Trap: How Tracking Accuracy Undermines Trust, Flow, and Value in Software Delivery
Tracking estimation accuracy in software delivery leads to mistrust, fear, and distorted behaviours. Focus on customer value, flow, and …
Flow of Value vs Flow of Work – Misnomer or Useful Shorthand?
Compares “flow of value” and “flow of work” in Kanban, explaining why only validated outcomes count as value and stressing the need for …
Why Outsourcing DevOps Fails, and How Real Engineering Excellence Starts With Your Team
Avoid DevOps vendor lock-in, discover how true engineering excellence starts with partnership, not outsourcing. Ready to transform your …
Detecting agile theatre with real delivery signals
Don’t Manage Dependencies, Remove Them
Explains why dependencies are a sign of poor system design and outlines steps to eliminate them by aligning teams, clarifying ownership, and …
The Estimation Trap: How Tracking Accuracy Undermines Trust, Flow, and Value in Software Delivery
Tracking estimation accuracy in software delivery leads to mistrust, fear, and distorted behaviours. Focus on customer value, flow, and …
Flow of Value vs Flow of Work – Misnomer or Useful Shorthand?
Compares “flow of value” and “flow of work” in Kanban, explaining why only validated outcomes count as value and stressing the need for …
Why Outsourcing DevOps Fails, and How Real Engineering Excellence Starts With Your Team
Avoid DevOps vendor lock-in, discover how true engineering excellence starts with partnership, not outsourcing. Ready to transform your …
Estimating Better in an Overloaded System Is a Poor Man’s Strategy
High work in progress (WIP) causes delays and unpredictability; improving estimates won’t help. Limiting WIP and focusing on flow is key to …
The Definition of Done is a Commitment to Quality
Defines the Definition of Done in Scrum as a clear, shared standard for quality, ensuring increments are releasable, transparent, and …
Why Your Definition of “Done” Is Holding Back Quality, Agility, and Trust, And How to Raise the Bar
Is your team’s “done” really done? Discover how a clear, objective definition of done boosts quality, agility, and trust in product …
Acceptance Criteria vs Definition of Done: Why Getting This Right Builds Trust and Delivers Quality Faster
Stop confusing acceptance criteria with definition of done, learn the crucial difference to boost quality, speed, and trust in your agile …
How to Evolve Your Definition of Done: Start Small, Grow Smarter, and Build Lasting Momentum
Unlock a smarter Definition of Done, start small, evolve standards, and build team momentum without overwhelm. Discover how progress drives …
Why Most Transformations Fail Without Honest Conversations
Most transformations fail without open, honest conversations that address real issues, making transparency and tough dialogue essential for …
Why Your Definition of Done Is the Secret Weapon for Real Business Impact and Agile Growth
Transform your definition of done into a strategic advantage, deliver real value, reduce risk, and drive business impact with every sprint.
Why Most Companies Operating Models Fail in Dynamic Markets
A concise comparison of Predictive and Adaptive Operating Models, explaining why traditional structures fail in dynamic markets and how …
Don’t Manage Dependencies, Remove Them
Explains why dependencies are a sign of poor system design and outlines steps to eliminate them by aligning teams, clarifying ownership, and …
The Estimation Trap: How Tracking Accuracy Undermines Trust, Flow, and Value in Software Delivery
Tracking estimation accuracy in software delivery leads to mistrust, fear, and distorted behaviours. Focus on customer value, flow, and …
Kendall Guide - A System of Work for AI Adoption
Flow of Value vs Flow of Work – Misnomer or Useful Shorthand?
Compares “flow of value” and “flow of work” in Kanban, explaining why only validated outcomes count as value and stressing the need for …
Estimating Better in an Overloaded System Is a Poor Man’s Strategy
High work in progress (WIP) causes delays and unpredictability; improving estimates won’t help. Limiting WIP and focusing on flow is key to …