You can’t spend much time in the Agile space without encountering teams doing some kind of special sprints. Whether it’s Sprint Zero, refactoring sprints, bug-fix sprints, or hardening sprints, these so-called “special sprints” are quite common. However, let’s cut to the chase: special sprints are agile banditry, and those practicing them are bandits in disguise. Here’s why they dilute your team’s ability to deliver usable, working products, and how you can avoid falling into the same trap.
The Purpose of Agile: Delivering Usable, Working Products
The core principle of Agile is to deliver usable working products at the end of every sprint. That’s it. Everything we do in Agile, from daily stand-ups to retrospectives, supports this goal.
-
Agile is all about visibility and stakeholder engagement.
-
It focuses on continuous delivery of usable products.
-
This practice reduces risk and increases adaptability.
When we adhere to these principles, we’re continuously improving our product, gathering feedback, and adjusting as we go. The aim is always to keep the product in a usable state, meaning that at any point, what we deliver can be shipped to production. This is the key to managing risk in Agile.
Traditional Risk Management vs. Agile Risk Management
In traditional project management, risk was mitigated through detailed planning. Teams would lay out extensive project plans and milestones that they believed wouldn’t change much over time. This method worked in predictable environments, but in today’s complex and uncertain landscapes, this level of detailed foresight is impossible.
-
In Agile, we manage risk by delivering incremental, usable products.
-
Instead of relying on rigid, long-term plans, we adjust based on what’s actually happening in real-time.
That’s why special sprints (like bug-fix or hardening sprints) are problematic. They offer a false sense of security, a “safety net”, that undermines the core Agile principle of delivering usable work every sprint.
Case Study: The Azure DevOps Team
A great example of this issue comes from the Azure DevOps team when they first transitioned to Scrum. They initially planned to run six regular sprints followed by a “hardening” or “safety net” sprint, where they’d fix bugs, clean up technical debt, and ensure everything was in good shape.
The Problem With Safety Nets
The team expected that as they worked through each sprint, they’d have an ebb and flow of incomplete tasks, or “undone work.” They imagined that by the time they reached their final safety net sprint, they’d be able to fix everything.
But here’s what really happened:
-
Because the team knew there was a safety net, they consistently deferred work, thinking, “We’ll fix that in the safety net sprint.”
-
This created a mountain of undone work, growing bigger with each sprint.
-
By the time they reached the safety net sprint, the work backlog was so overwhelming they couldn’t fix it all.
The Solution: No More Safety Nets
Realizing their mistake, the team restarted their approach. They shifted to a model of three-week sprints with no safety net at the end.
-
At the end of every sprint, they had to ship to production.
-
There was no “maybe we’ll ship”; it was an absolute must.
-
As a result, they were forced to pay off technical debt during each sprint, ensure high quality, and reduce the amount of undone work.
This approach led to a much healthier workflow and helped the team truly embrace Agile principles.
Why Special Sprints Are Agile Banditry
When teams rely on special sprints, they’re taking risks they shouldn’t be taking. They’re kicking the can down the road, hoping they’ll have time to clean up the mess later. But Agile isn’t about delaying responsibility, it’s about continuous improvement and delivering value every single sprint.
Here’s why special sprints are a problem:
-
They dilute focus: Teams shift from building usable products to thinking they have time to fix everything later.
-
They create hidden risks: The longer you delay fixing technical debt or bugs, the bigger the risks grow.
-
They undermine agility: Agile is about quick adjustments. Special sprints make teams slower to react because they’re piling up problems for later.
The Safety Net Trap
As we saw with the Azure DevOps team, safety nets lead to reckless behavior. When teams know they have a chance to clean things up later, they tend to cut corners and take more risks. This isn’t just inefficient; it’s dangerous.
Imagine a tightrope walker, if they know there’s a net below them, they might be tempted to take more chances. But if there’s no net, they’ll walk with focus and precision, knowing that every step counts. The same goes for Agile teams. When there’s no safety net, every sprint must be treated like it matters, because it does.
How to Avoid Agile Banditry in Your Team
If you’re noticing that your team is falling into the trap of special sprints or safety nets, here are some practical steps you can take:
1. Eliminate Special Sprints
-
No Sprint Zero, no hardening sprints: Treat every sprint as a step towards a usable, deliverable product.
-
Focus on deliverable value: Ask your team, “What can we ship at the end of this sprint?”
2. Pay Off Technical Debt Early
- Don’t let technical debt build up over multiple sprints. Make it a priority to clean up code, fix bugs, and address issues as they arise.
3. Set Clear Expectations
- Make it clear to the team that every sprint must produce a usable product. There’s no such thing as “we’ll fix it next time.”
4. Continuously Improve
- Use retrospectives to identify where your team is cutting corners or deferring work. Address these issues head-on.
Agile Bandits Beware!
If you’re being ambushed by agile bandits in your organization, those pushing for special sprints or other shortcuts, stand your ground. Agile isn’t about taking risks; it’s about mitigating them by delivering small, usable, and valuable products every sprint. If you need help eliminating these pitfalls, feel free to reach out to my team at Naked Agility, or contact a consultant who can guide your team towards true agility. Together, we can create real value, sprint by sprint, without any safety nets.
Smart Classifications
Each classification [Concepts, Categories, & Tags] was assigned using AI-powered semantic analysis and scored across relevance, depth, and alignment. Final decisions? Still human. Always traceable. Hover to see how it applies.
What to read next
Ditching the Myth of Special Sprints: Embrace True Agile Practices for Usable Products
Explains why relying on special Sprints undermines Agile, and advocates for continuous improvement, accountability, and delivering usable …
The Pitfalls of Agile Burndowns: Stop Being Agile Bandits
Explains why relying on Agile burndown charts leads to over-planning and false progress, and advocates for minimal, adaptive planning and …
Rethinking Sprint Planning: Why Burndown Charts Are Agile Banditry and What to Do Instead
Explains why burndown charts hinder agile teams, highlighting the pitfalls of detailed upfront planning and advocating for minimal, adaptive …
How to Overcome Agile Banditry: A Product Owner’s Journey
Explains the pitfalls of micromanagement in Agile, showing Product Owners how to avoid "Agile Banditry" by focusing on vision, value, and …
Ditching Agile Banditry: Why Story Points and Velocity Metrics Are Undermining Your Team's Success
Explores how relying on story points and velocity can harm Agile teams, advocating for objective metrics like cycle time and throughput to …
How Usable Working Products Are Your Ultimate Weapon Against Risks
Delivering usable, working products frequently is key to reducing risk in Agile. Focus on feedback, automation, and lean practices over …
Detecting agile theatre with real delivery signals
Why Most Companies Operating Models Fail in Dynamic Markets
A concise comparison of Predictive and Adaptive Operating Models, explaining why traditional structures fail in dynamic markets and how …
Don’t Manage Dependencies, Remove Them
Explains why dependencies are a sign of poor system design and outlines steps to eliminate them by aligning teams, clarifying ownership, and …
The Estimation Trap: How Tracking Accuracy Undermines Trust, Flow, and Value in Software Delivery
Tracking estimation accuracy in software delivery leads to mistrust, fear, and distorted behaviours. Focus on customer value, flow, and …
Flow of Value vs Flow of Work – Misnomer or Useful Shorthand?
Compares “flow of value” and “flow of work” in Kanban, explaining why only validated outcomes count as value and stressing the need for …
Why Outsourcing DevOps Fails, and How Real Engineering Excellence Starts With Your Team
Avoid DevOps vendor lock-in, discover how true engineering excellence starts with partnership, not outsourcing. Ready to transform your …
Why Most Companies Operating Models Fail in Dynamic Markets
A concise comparison of Predictive and Adaptive Operating Models, explaining why traditional structures fail in dynamic markets and how …
Don’t Manage Dependencies, Remove Them
Explains why dependencies are a sign of poor system design and outlines steps to eliminate them by aligning teams, clarifying ownership, and …
The Estimation Trap: How Tracking Accuracy Undermines Trust, Flow, and Value in Software Delivery
Tracking estimation accuracy in software delivery leads to mistrust, fear, and distorted behaviours. Focus on customer value, flow, and …
Kendall Guide - A System of Work for AI Adoption
Flow of Value vs Flow of Work – Misnomer or Useful Shorthand?
Compares “flow of value” and “flow of work” in Kanban, explaining why only validated outcomes count as value and stressing the need for …
Estimating Better in an Overloaded System Is a Poor Man’s Strategy
High work in progress (WIP) causes delays and unpredictability; improving estimates won’t help. Limiting WIP and focusing on flow is key to …
Don’t Manage Dependencies, Remove Them
Explains why dependencies are a sign of poor system design and outlines steps to eliminate them by aligning teams, clarifying ownership, and …
Why Outsourcing DevOps Fails, and How Real Engineering Excellence Starts With Your Team
Avoid DevOps vendor lock-in, discover how true engineering excellence starts with partnership, not outsourcing. Ready to transform your …
Why Big Bang Rewrites Fail: How Sustainable Change and Engineering Excellence Transform Legacy Systems
Ditch the Big Bang rewrite. Discover why sustainable, in-place change drives true engineering excellence and lasting transformation in your …
Is Agile Really Just a Mindset?
Explores Agile as a disciplined system of delivery, emphasizing engineering excellence, CI/CD, observability, and system design over mindset …
Telling People What to Do Is Not Leadership. It’s a Failure of System Design
Explores why real leadership means designing systems that enable team autonomy, flow, and accountability, rather than relying on …
From Legacy Pain to Modern DevOps: My Proven Roadmap for Real Engineering Transformation
Transform legacy engineering with a proven, step-by-step approach, learn how to automate, adapt, and build a resilient, modern DevOps …
The Definition of Done is a Commitment to Quality
Defines the Definition of Done in Scrum as a clear, shared standard for quality, ensuring increments are releasable, transparent, and …
Why Your Definition of “Done” Is Holding Back Quality, Agility, and Trust, And How to Raise the Bar
Is your team’s “done” really done? Discover how a clear, objective definition of done boosts quality, agility, and trust in product …
Acceptance Criteria vs Definition of Done: Why Getting This Right Builds Trust and Delivers Quality Faster
Stop confusing acceptance criteria with definition of done, learn the crucial difference to boost quality, speed, and trust in your agile …
How to Evolve Your Definition of Done: Start Small, Grow Smarter, and Build Lasting Momentum
Unlock a smarter Definition of Done, start small, evolve standards, and build team momentum without overwhelm. Discover how progress drives …
Why Most Transformations Fail Without Honest Conversations
Most transformations fail without open, honest conversations that address real issues, making transparency and tough dialogue essential for …
Why Your Definition of Done Is the Secret Weapon for Real Business Impact and Agile Growth
Transform your definition of done into a strategic advantage, deliver real value, reduce risk, and drive business impact with every sprint.