In my journey through the world of Agile, I’ve encountered a recurring theme that I can only describe as “agile banditry.” This term might sound a bit dramatic, but it perfectly encapsulates the misuse of certain Agile practices that can undermine the very principles we strive to uphold. One of the most common culprits? The infamous story points and velocity metrics.
The Misuse of Story Points and Velocity
Let’s be clear: story points and velocity are often wielded like weapons against teams. I’ve seen it happen time and again, leadership or stakeholders will use these metrics to ambush teams, demanding predictability and performance based on subjective measures. This approach not only misrepresents the true nature of Agile but also creates an environment of mistrust and anxiety.
- Subjectivity at Play: Story points are inherently subjective. They rely on team members’ perceptions and estimations, which can vary widely. When these points are used to evaluate performance, they can lead to misunderstandings and misaligned expectations.
- Ambushing Teams and Leadership: I’ve witnessed teams being pressured to justify their velocity, often leading to a toxic atmosphere where they feel they must “perform” rather than collaborate. This is not what Agile is about. It’s about fostering a culture of openness and continuous improvement, not one of fear and defensiveness.
A Call to Action: Ditch the Banditry
So, what can we do instead? I urge you to abandon the use of story points and velocity as performance metrics. Instead, focus on more objective measures that truly reflect the team’s output and efficiency. Here are a couple of alternatives that I’ve found to be far more effective:
-
Cycle Time: This metric measures the time it takes for a task to move from start to finish. It provides a clear picture of how efficiently work is being completed and can help identify bottlenecks in the process.
-
Throughput: This refers to the number of tasks completed in a given timeframe. By tracking throughput, teams can gain insights into their capacity and make informed decisions about future work.
Embracing Objective Measures
By shifting our focus to cycle time and throughput, we can foster a more collaborative environment where teams feel empowered to share their challenges and successes without the fear of being judged by arbitrary numbers. This approach aligns with the core values of Agile, transparency, collaboration, and continuous improvement.
In my experience, when teams are encouraged to engage in meaningful conversations about their work, rather than being pressured to meet specific metrics, they become more cohesive and productive. They start to understand their processes better and can adapt more effectively to changes.
Conclusion
Let’s put an end to agile banditry. By moving away from the misuse of story points and velocity, we can create a healthier Agile environment that prioritises genuine collaboration and improvement. Remember, Agile is not just about delivering software; it’s about delivering value through empowered teams.
So, the next time you find yourself reaching for those story points, take a step back. Ask yourself: are these metrics helping my team, or are they just another form of ambush? Let’s choose wisely and embrace the true spirit of Agile.
Smart Classifications
Each classification [Concepts, Categories, & Tags] was assigned using AI-powered semantic analysis and scored across relevance, depth, and alignment. Final decisions? Still human. Always traceable. Hover to see how it applies.
What to read next
Avoiding Agile Banditry: Why Story Points and Velocity Are Misleading Metrics
Explains why story points and velocity can mislead Agile teams, and recommends focusing on throughput, cycle time, and customer value for …
Ditch the Agile Bandit Mentality: How to Prioritise Value Over Estimates for Team Success
Explores why focusing on value delivery and psychological safety leads to better Agile team outcomes than fixating on estimates, output …
Story Points: A Ghost of Agile Past
Explores the problems with story points in Agile, their impact on team behaviour, and why flow metrics offer a better way to measure …
Say-Do Metrics: Avoiding Agile Banditry in Your Organization
Explains the risks of using say-do metrics in Agile, highlighting how they encourage vanity metrics, harm psychological safety, and shift …
Scrum is like communism, it doesn't work. Myth 2
Explains why story points are often misunderstood in Scrum, clarifies their intended use, and offers practical advice for more effective …
Deciphering the Enigma of Story Points Across Teams
Explains why Story Points are subjective and unsuitable for comparing teams, and highlights objective metrics like throughput and value for …
Detecting agile theatre with real delivery signals
Why Most Companies Operating Models Fail in Dynamic Markets
A concise comparison of Predictive and Adaptive Operating Models, explaining why traditional structures fail in dynamic markets and how …
Don’t Manage Dependencies, Remove Them
Explains why dependencies are a sign of poor system design and outlines steps to eliminate them by aligning teams, clarifying ownership, and …
The Estimation Trap: How Tracking Accuracy Undermines Trust, Flow, and Value in Software Delivery
Tracking estimation accuracy in software delivery leads to mistrust, fear, and distorted behaviours. Focus on customer value, flow, and …
Flow of Value vs Flow of Work – Misnomer or Useful Shorthand?
Compares “flow of value” and “flow of work” in Kanban, explaining why only validated outcomes count as value and stressing the need for …
Why Outsourcing DevOps Fails, and How Real Engineering Excellence Starts With Your Team
Avoid DevOps vendor lock-in, discover how true engineering excellence starts with partnership, not outsourcing. Ready to transform your …
Why Most Companies Operating Models Fail in Dynamic Markets
A concise comparison of Predictive and Adaptive Operating Models, explaining why traditional structures fail in dynamic markets and how …
Don’t Manage Dependencies, Remove Them
Explains why dependencies are a sign of poor system design and outlines steps to eliminate them by aligning teams, clarifying ownership, and …
The Estimation Trap: How Tracking Accuracy Undermines Trust, Flow, and Value in Software Delivery
Tracking estimation accuracy in software delivery leads to mistrust, fear, and distorted behaviours. Focus on customer value, flow, and …
Kendall Guide - A System of Work for AI Adoption
Flow of Value vs Flow of Work – Misnomer or Useful Shorthand?
Compares “flow of value” and “flow of work” in Kanban, explaining why only validated outcomes count as value and stressing the need for …
Estimating Better in an Overloaded System Is a Poor Man’s Strategy
High work in progress (WIP) causes delays and unpredictability; improving estimates won’t help. Limiting WIP and focusing on flow is key to …