In the world of traditional budgeting, we often find ourselves entrenched in a cycle that feels more like a battleground than a strategic planning session. Each year, we gather around the table, armed with our spreadsheets and projections, ready to fight for our share of the budget pie. It’s a familiar scene: departments squabbling over funds, each vying for the largest slice, knowing that if they don’t spend their allocated budget, they risk losing it the following year.
This approach, while seemingly straightforward, is fraught with pitfalls. For instance, if a project is allocated a million dollars but only utilises half of that, the following year’s budget discussions become a challenge. The narrative shifts from “we need more” to “why should we give you the same amount again?” This creates a culture of underutilisation and fear of not spending, which ultimately stifles innovation and responsiveness.
The Flaws of Annual Budgeting
Let’s take a moment to reflect on the implications of this traditional model:
-
Rigidity: Once the budget is set, it’s as if we’ve sealed our fate. The market is dynamic, and the needs of our customers can shift in an instant. Yet, we’re stuck with a budget that was ratified months ago, often before we even had a chance to see how the year would unfold.
-
Missed Opportunities: Imagine a scenario where a brilliant idea emerges mid-year, one that could capture a significant market opportunity. However, because it wasn’t included in the annual budget, it’s sidelined, and we lose out on potential revenue and growth.
-
Unrealised Value: In the realm of evidence-based management, we often talk about unrealised value. This is the value that exists in our backlog but isn’t being acted upon. The traditional budgeting cycle makes it incredibly difficult to adapt to these shifts, leading to a backlog that doesn’t reflect the true potential of our products.
Embracing Beyond Budgeting
So, how do we break free from this cycle? Enter the concept of Beyond Budgeting. This approach encourages organisations to rethink their budgeting processes, allowing for more flexibility and responsiveness. Here’s what I’ve learned from my experiences:
-
Dynamic Funding: Instead of allocating all funds at the start of the year, consider a model where you have a pool of finance available. This allows you to allocate resources to projects as they arise, based on their current value and potential impact.
-
Iterative Investment: In the agile world, we’re accustomed to delivering working products to our customers frequently. This principle can be applied to budgeting as well. By assessing projects regularly, you can decide whether to continue funding them or pivot to new initiatives that offer greater value.
-
Value-Driven Decisions: Shift your focus from merely spending the budget to maximising value. This means being willing to stop funding projects that no longer deliver value and redirecting those resources to more promising opportunities.
A Real-World Example
I recently worked with a manufacturing client who faced a significant challenge. They had an ageing machine that was producing faulty parts, leading to costly recalls. Despite the clear need for a new machine, the request for a $10 million investment was denied because it wasn’t in the budget for that year. The result? A billion-dollar recall that could have been avoided.
This scenario highlights the dangers of rigid budgeting. The cost of inaction far outweighed the initial investment, and it’s a stark reminder of why we need to adapt our budgeting processes to be more aligned with the realities of our business environment.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the traditional budgeting model is no longer fit for purpose in today’s fast-paced, ever-changing market. By embracing Beyond Budgeting principles, we can create a more agile, responsive organisation that prioritises value over rigid allocations.
As we move forward, let’s challenge the status quo and rethink how we approach budgeting. It’s time to allocate resources in a way that reflects the dynamic nature of our work, allowing us to seize opportunities as they arise and ultimately drive greater success for our organisations.
Remember, the goal is not just to spend the budget but to maximise the value we deliver to our customers and stakeholders. Let’s make that our new mantra.
Smart Classifications
Each classification [Concepts, Categories, & Tags] was assigned using AI-powered semantic analysis and scored across relevance, depth, and alignment. Final decisions? Still human. Always traceable. Hover to see how it applies.
What to read next
Maximising Product Value: The Power of Hypothesis-Driven Engineering
Explores how hypothesis-driven engineering helps teams maximise product value by testing ideas, measuring outcomes, and learning from …
Empowering Teams with Financial Insights: The Key to Maximising ROI and Fostering Ownership
Empowering teams with financial insights boosts ownership, informed decision-making, and ROI by aligning daily work with business goals …
Rethinking Sprint Planning: Why Burndown Charts Are Agile Banditry and What to Do Instead
Explains why burndown charts hinder agile teams, highlighting the pitfalls of detailed upfront planning and advocating for minimal, adaptive …
Rethinking Backlog Management: Why a Flat Structure Boosts Agility and Value Delivery
Explains how using a flat backlog structure, rather than a hierarchy, improves agility, prioritisation, and value delivery in Scrum and …
Beyond the Agile Illusion: Embracing True Agility in a World of Taylorism
Explores the difference between true agility and superficial agile practices, highlighting the impact of Taylorism and offering steps to …
How do you make a good Forecast?
Explains how to create reliable forecasts in agile projects by using flow metrics like cycle time and throughput, and shifting from …
Detecting agile theatre with real delivery signals
Why Most Companies Operating Models Fail in Dynamic Markets
A concise comparison of Predictive and Adaptive Operating Models, explaining why traditional structures fail in dynamic markets and how …
Don’t Manage Dependencies, Remove Them
Explains why dependencies are a sign of poor system design and outlines steps to eliminate them by aligning teams, clarifying ownership, and …
The Estimation Trap: How Tracking Accuracy Undermines Trust, Flow, and Value in Software Delivery
Tracking estimation accuracy in software delivery leads to mistrust, fear, and distorted behaviours. Focus on customer value, flow, and …
Flow of Value vs Flow of Work – Misnomer or Useful Shorthand?
Compares “flow of value” and “flow of work” in Kanban, explaining why only validated outcomes count as value and stressing the need for …
Why Outsourcing DevOps Fails, and How Real Engineering Excellence Starts With Your Team
Avoid DevOps vendor lock-in, discover how true engineering excellence starts with partnership, not outsourcing. Ready to transform your …
Why Most Companies Operating Models Fail in Dynamic Markets
A concise comparison of Predictive and Adaptive Operating Models, explaining why traditional structures fail in dynamic markets and how …
The Estimation Trap: How Tracking Accuracy Undermines Trust, Flow, and Value in Software Delivery
Tracking estimation accuracy in software delivery leads to mistrust, fear, and distorted behaviours. Focus on customer value, flow, and …
Getting Started with Objectives & Key Results
Learn how to successfully implement OKRs by aligning clear strategy, fostering transparency, empowering teams, focusing on outcomes, and …
OKR Guide - A Social Discipline for Shared Focus, Measurable Contribution, and Strategic Learning
A certification proves you’ve passed a test
Certifications show test-passing ability but don’t prove real-world product skills. Experience, judgement, and stakeholder influence matter …
Most companies still get Product Ownership wrong
Many organisations misunderstand Product Ownership, treating it as simple backlog management instead of a strategic, accountable role …
Why Most Companies Operating Models Fail in Dynamic Markets
A concise comparison of Predictive and Adaptive Operating Models, explaining why traditional structures fail in dynamic markets and how …
Don’t Manage Dependencies, Remove Them
Explains why dependencies are a sign of poor system design and outlines steps to eliminate them by aligning teams, clarifying ownership, and …
The Estimation Trap: How Tracking Accuracy Undermines Trust, Flow, and Value in Software Delivery
Tracking estimation accuracy in software delivery leads to mistrust, fear, and distorted behaviours. Focus on customer value, flow, and …
Kendall Guide - A System of Work for AI Adoption
Flow of Value vs Flow of Work – Misnomer or Useful Shorthand?
Compares “flow of value” and “flow of work” in Kanban, explaining why only validated outcomes count as value and stressing the need for …
Estimating Better in an Overloaded System Is a Poor Man’s Strategy
High work in progress (WIP) causes delays and unpredictability; improving estimates won’t help. Limiting WIP and focusing on flow is key to …