As an agile consultant, I’ve learned a multitude of lessons over the years, but one stands out above the rest: the statement of work (SoW) often bears little resemblance to the actual problems my clients face. This insight transcends the realm of agile consulting; it applies to any consulting role.
The Disconnect Between SoW and Client Needs
In my experience, the primary focus for many consultants is to deliver on the SoW. It’s a straightforward approach: “Here’s the contract, and this is what we need to do.” However, I’ve found that this can lead to a losing proposition. Delivering exactly what’s outlined in the SoW can result in unhappy clients because, more often than not, it doesn’t address their real needs.
- Unmet Needs: Clients may receive what they asked for, but if it doesn’t bring about systemic, lasting change, they’re left feeling dissatisfied.
- Temporary Solutions: Without addressing the core issues, organisations often revert to their old ways as soon as the consultant leaves.
A Personal Anecdote
Let me share a personal experience that illustrates this point. I was on a train in England, and the Wi-Fi was utterly horrendous. Frustrated, I tweeted the train company to express my dissatisfaction. Their response? “We’re not contractually obligated to provide Wi-Fi.”
This response epitomises the pitfalls of rigidly adhering to a contract. It’s a classic case of missing the forest for the trees. The company was so focused on the letter of the contract that they neglected the spirit of customer service.
Rethinking Contracts
This experience has shaped my approach to contracts. I often prefer to work without formal contracts, opting instead for a more flexible arrangement. Here’s how I typically operate:
- Variable Contracts: I use what I call an “email contract.” It’s simple: “Can you help us out?” “Yes, I can.” “What dates?” “These dates.” That’s enough for me to book my flights and get to work.
- Trust Over Formality: This approach has served me well, especially with larger clients who often come with their own contracts. I assume an NDA for every engagement, but I prefer to maintain a level of flexibility that allows me to adapt to the client’s needs on the ground.
Delivering Value Beyond the SoW
The key takeaway here is that delivering value should be the primary goal, not merely fulfilling the terms of a contract. I strive to provide enough value that my clients feel confident in saying, “Yes, Martin delivered.”
- Focus on Relationships: Building a relationship with clients allows for a more dynamic and adaptive approach. When you understand their needs, you can deliver solutions that truly matter.
- Value-Driven Engagement: By prioritising value over contractual obligations, I ensure that my clients receive the support they need, even if it diverges from the original SoW.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the most valuable lesson I’ve learned as a consultant is to focus on the real needs of my clients rather than the constraints of a contract. By fostering relationships and delivering genuine value, I can help organisations achieve lasting change.
If you found this insight helpful, I encourage you to engage with me. Whether you want to discuss agile, scrum, or DevOps, feel free to book a coffee chat through Naked Agility. I always welcome the opportunity to connect and share ideas.
Smart Classifications
Each classification [Concepts, Categories, & Tags] was assigned using AI-powered semantic analysis and scored across relevance, depth, and alignment. Final decisions? Still human. Always traceable. Hover to see how it applies.
What to read next
Navigating Client Needs: How Agile Consultants Can Uncover True Value Beyond Initial Requests
Explores how agile consultants identify clients' real needs, avoid common pitfalls, and deliver lasting value by looking beyond initial …
Unlocking Agile Consulting: Transform Your Organisation with Diverse Strategies and Continuous Learning
Explains Agile consulting by highlighting diverse strategies, continuous learning, and practical ways to help organisations improve …
1 thing that sinks a consulting engagement before it starts gaining traction?
Overly detailed consulting contracts can hinder project success by limiting flexibility; focus on outcomes and value to adapt to changing …
Navigating My Most Memorable Challenge as an Agile Consultant: Lessons in Readiness and Engagement
A personal account highlighting the importance of organisational readiness, engagement, and listening for successful agile consulting and …
Unlocking Transformation: Why Embracing Difficult Conversations with Agile Consultants is Key to Success
Explores how open, challenging conversations with agile consultants drive organisational change, foster learning, and support continuous …
My journey into Professional Scrum
Reflects on experiences with Professional Scrum, highlighting its impact on software development, team culture, training, and the challenges …
Detecting agile theatre with real delivery signals
Why Most Companies Operating Models Fail in Dynamic Markets
A concise comparison of Predictive and Adaptive Operating Models, explaining why traditional structures fail in dynamic markets and how …
Don’t Manage Dependencies, Remove Them
Explains why dependencies are a sign of poor system design and outlines steps to eliminate them by aligning teams, clarifying ownership, and …
The Estimation Trap: How Tracking Accuracy Undermines Trust, Flow, and Value in Software Delivery
Tracking estimation accuracy in software delivery leads to mistrust, fear, and distorted behaviours. Focus on customer value, flow, and …
Flow of Value vs Flow of Work – Misnomer or Useful Shorthand?
Compares “flow of value” and “flow of work” in Kanban, explaining why only validated outcomes count as value and stressing the need for …
Why Outsourcing DevOps Fails, and How Real Engineering Excellence Starts With Your Team
Avoid DevOps vendor lock-in, discover how true engineering excellence starts with partnership, not outsourcing. Ready to transform your …
Why Most Companies Operating Models Fail in Dynamic Markets
A concise comparison of Predictive and Adaptive Operating Models, explaining why traditional structures fail in dynamic markets and how …
Don’t Manage Dependencies, Remove Them
Explains why dependencies are a sign of poor system design and outlines steps to eliminate them by aligning teams, clarifying ownership, and …
The Estimation Trap: How Tracking Accuracy Undermines Trust, Flow, and Value in Software Delivery
Tracking estimation accuracy in software delivery leads to mistrust, fear, and distorted behaviours. Focus on customer value, flow, and …
Kendall Guide - A System of Work for AI Adoption
Flow of Value vs Flow of Work – Misnomer or Useful Shorthand?
Compares “flow of value” and “flow of work” in Kanban, explaining why only validated outcomes count as value and stressing the need for …
Estimating Better in an Overloaded System Is a Poor Man’s Strategy
High work in progress (WIP) causes delays and unpredictability; improving estimates won’t help. Limiting WIP and focusing on flow is key to …