There no such thing as "good" technical debt

TL;DR

Technical debt is always harmful and should not be considered acceptable; it slows onboarding, increases errors, and creates inefficiency. It accumulates quickly and can suddenly halt delivery, as seen in Microsoft's experience before they overhauled their processes and addressed their debt. Development managers should prioritize identifying and reducing technical debt now rather than accepting it as normal.

19 April 2025
Written by Martin Hinshelwood
1 minute read
Comments
Subscribe

Let’s put this to rest: there’s no such thing as “good” technical debt.

If new engineers take weeks to become productive, your system is unreadable. If every change introduces faults, your architecture is fragile. If you’re manually handling tasks that should be automated, you’re building inefficiency into your process.

And here’s the kicker, technical debt doesn’t accumulate linearly. It builds up silently, then one day, it collapses your ability to deliver.

Microsoft learned this the hard way with TFS. They were shipping 24 features per year across a team of 600 engineers. The solution? A complete overhaul in how they worked. They moved to 3-week Sprints, embraced transparency, and started paying back their technical debt.

Stop normalising dysfunction. There’s no “acceptable level” of technical debt, only risk you haven’t accounted for yet.

What’s stopping your team from tackling technical debt head-on?

Smart Classifications

Each classification [Concepts, Categories, & Tags] was assigned using AI-powered semantic analysis and scored across relevance, depth, and alignment. Final decisions? Still human. Always traceable. Hover to see how it applies.

Comments
Subscribe

What to read next

Signal Engineering Excellence

Understand the true risk of technical debt in your business

Technical debt poses significant business risks, reducing agility, slowing innovation, and causing lost opportunities. Addressing it is …

Read article
Signal Engineering Excellence

Technical debt cripples business agility and slows engineers down

Technical debt limits business agility, slows engineering, and hinders innovation. Managing it with automation and transparency is key to …

Read article
Signal Engineering Excellence DevOps

Technical debt isn’t just messy code

Technical debt includes slow feedback, fragile systems, and manual processes that hinder progress. Addressing it early with automation and …

Read article
Video Engineering Excellence

Mastering Technical Debt: Strategies to Transform Challenges into Opportunities for Your Development Team

Explains technical debt in software development, its impact on teams, and practical strategies to identify, manage, and reduce it for …

Watch video
Video Engineering Excellence Technical Leadership

Navigating Technical Debt: How to Transform Challenges into Opportunities for Quality and Efficiency

Explains how managing technical debt and distinguishing it from poor quality can boost product efficiency, reduce costs, and support …

Watch video
Video Technical Leadership Engineering Excellence

How to Tackle Technical Debt Without Halting Progress: Smarter Ways to Keep Your Team Moving Forward

Struggling with technical debt? Discover practical ways to tackle legacy systems, boost team morale, and deliver value, without grinding to …

Watch video